Career opportunities are not static entities but are more like flowing oceans; avenues for success are turbulent at times and smooth during others.

Tiedeman and O'Hara (1963)

 

Career decision specificity

Choosing a career direction or the art of sailing in turbulent waters

Career decision difficulties

Decision making competence

Tiedeman's career decision model - adaptability will make you win

 x

x

         

Career decision specificity

 

A career decision is a special category of decisions. It represents the distance between an existing and a desirable state.

Both, the initial state (I do not know myself as good and as realistic I think) and the final state (I only have a somehow limited view over the labor market) are vaguely defined; even more unclear are the strategies you need to use.

 

There are two levels to consider the career decision process:

  • An extended level that encompass the entire career development process from anticipating the decision moment to implementing the decision. Several authors include in the term "decision" also self knowledge, career exploration, make choices, deploy efforts for narrow the long list and build the "short list", and, in the end, star the action according to a plan.
  • A narrower level, where decision is synonym with a process of deliberating about several variants and selecting one considered the best in that moment.

 

Choosing a career direction or the art of sailing in turbulent waters

x

Although some people look like they could find without effort an optimal life course, most of us have to go through a long deliberative process with many obstacles and failures. 


Chronologically, due to industrialization, the first career decision model is based on Parson's work (1909) about the wise choice of a vocation, and this is the source of many models in which reason is the supreme governing instance.


In these models, the person who decides about her/his career is seen as an objective scientist who is methodical, systematic, independent ... and maintains as an ultimate goal the maximization of personal gain.

 

 

Rational career decisions need efficient information processing in the field of self and occupational knowledge, of conditions for success, and also decision making skills, obviously based on the true reason (Parson's original concept).

 

After almost a century, the new informational era and the researches in human psychology outline a more complex and even disturbing picture. There is a rational-logic way of information processing, but there is also an intuitive and automatic way, which is responsible for the majority of our decisions.


People often believe that they are aware of the cognitive processes governing their behavior but they are not completely right. The cognitive processes sometimes function at a subconscious level. When we try retrospectively to think about this, we tend to rebuild the decisional process from a new perspective.


Therefore, what we present as our choice criteria for a past decision, often have little in common with the true motives of our choice at that time.

In the very end, the accuracy of a decision depends upon the quality of information the decision maker has: therefore, optimally obtaining information is mandatory.

 

Given these conditions, "nonrational" decision models emerged. The accent moved towards intuition, emotion, subjectivity and interdependence, accepting ambiguity and incertitude.

The only strategy recommended by the practitioners of those career-counseling models is the accumulation of work-related experience. Nonrational models emphasize what is probably the most valuable component of a career decision: to have correct and authentic information gathered through experience.

 

At questionnaires answered by young people concerning their career decision process, the most common themes were: deciding based on intuition, on various experiences, and based on feelings.

Social support proved to be a very present factor in a career decision: family's and friends' opinions have strongly influenced decisions and engaging in various activities such courses, internships or jobs have determined an indispensable information support.

 

Talent Gate considers that having sufficient information leads to a good decision.

  1. We suggest that a rational and conscious manner of career information processing is the most probable way that leads to success
  2. We are aware that many people have in their nature a decision making style which is rather intuitive, experiential, implicit and emotionally charged. More uncontrollable and exposed to errors, this decisional style becomes useful when there are no arguments or the speed is essential. Its success rate will substantially increase if intuition is well nurtured with rich and relevant information gathered through experience
  3. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of occupational engagement imagined as a process of extending options, which enlarges the information and experiences "database" of the career decision maker

 If you are a rational, logic type, it would be wise to watch two aspects:

  • Try not to deliberate too long because you don't have enough information to make a decision. Learn how to use the sufficient minimum for making a choice.
  • Try not to ignore your emotions and the implications for significant others when making a decision. You will not have the energy for a constant implementation of the decision you have made if you are not affectively committed to that decision or concentrated on managing emotional discomfort

If you are the emotional type you should also be cautious. Some values and preferences, based on emotions, tend to fluctuate, and relying on your impulses could lead to a sum of unnecessary decisions and changes.

 

Regardless the situations, you being rational or intuitive-emotional, do not adopt a passive - contemplative attitude.  Take action!

Get into various activities that could bring you experience and information. Try to use a rational filter when you have clear arguments or benchmarks. In the same time, do not trust only your reasoning, but carefully select your inspirational sources. 

 

Be prepared to accept chance as a starting point for a career or a career change, be open minded and flexible for using any opportunity.

 
  • Use your sensing to evaluate objectively the situation. Which are the concrete facts and things that you should take in consideration, having connection with your education, professional experience, or with present economic situation?
  • Use your intuition to see beyond present, toward new possibilities. Use your imagination to evaluate options you have never considered until now. Have you been stuck in old thinking routines?  Are there experiences in your past that you missed? Try to expand your vision of the future from one to ten years or even to the end of your life.
  • Use your thinking to make a critical and objective analysis of a possible choice. Consider especially your career dreams. Which could be good or bad sides of an option? Be as realistic as possible!
  • Use your feelings to evaluate how your choices could influence the relationships with your family, friends or colleagues. How about your needs for security, accepting challenges or living your life with integrity? How will your choices affect the things you most care for in your life?

(Jung - Myers Brigs Type Indicator theory)

Career decision difficulties

 

Errors or bad strategies are also very important for the career decision process. There are several specific categories for decision-making difficulties:


The first major category, lack of readiness, includes 3 difficulty sub-categories that may arise prior to the career decision-making process:

  • Lack of motivation to engage in the career decision-making process
  • General indecisiveness
  • Dysfunctional beliefs, which also include irrational expectations about the career decision-making process

The second major category refers to lack of information about the process, the self, the occupations, and the ways of obtaining additional information.


Finally, the third major category is inconsistent information and includes unreliable information and internal or external conflicts.


Of course, several strategies may help you to overcome decisional difficulties:
  • Identify dysfunctional beliefs that alter your perception and have a negative influence on your self-confidence or the motivation to engage in a decisional process
  • Find useful and correct information about you (professional assessments) and occupational environment (a systematic and organized exploration process)
  • Search for a professional career counselor advice or a trustful "mentor" which can guide your steps

 

Career indecision is a phenomenon you already faced, or if not, you certainly will. Try to evaluate as honestly as possible your previous decisional behaviors in order to identify what determined indecision.


Was your indecision just a bad conjuncture or you belong, generally speaking, to that category of people who arrive hardly to a decision, being afraid of falling into error or taking responsibility?

 

Most of the times, you will need an external point of view and an expert's eye. Do not be afraid to discover that you are a person that permanently procrastinates. It would be useful for you to learn, close to a counselor, how to surpass this obstacle. 

 

Within certain circumstances is useful not to make a decision if you do not believe in it; do not act just because "you have to" or is something "image-valued" in the social environment. It is healthier to continue exploring (and not to passively resign) until you find the choice which entirely gain your commitment.

Take care not to transform indecision into virtue: whatever you might do (even if you stand still) time is irreversibly flying away ...

 

Decision making competence

 

A decision is a deliberate choice between several options. 

Professionals talk about a decision-making competence (DMC) that should relate to cognitive ability. In other words, decision-making could be seen as a form of intelligence, but it is not limited to this.

Decision making processes involve, typically, 4 fundamental skills:

  • To have accurate opinions about things: this skill means to be accurate when you consider how probable an event will occur or a statement is true or false
  • To have stable benchmarks when making evaluations: this means to have consistent well-articulated values. The point is not having good or poor values (this is a matter of individual taste) but rather not being fluctuant without good reason and correctly discerning between significant and non-significant
  • To correctly create a decision rule: using accurate opinions and stable benchmarks one can effectively create a strategy to choose the most useful variant and put it in practice
  • To have a balanced confidence about your decision competence: people with unwarranted confidence may undertake tasks beyond their abilities, underutilize available assistance, and neglect signs that decisions go wrong. People with insufficient confidence may hesitate too much, defer to others, or doubt their ability to identify appropriate courses of action.

Having this "formula", the decision-making competence (DMC) seems indeed a form of intelligence, that leads to favorable social outcomes:

  • It was found that generally, smarter people tend to make better decisions
  • People "skilled" in making decisions come rather from positive social and family environments where they received pertinent feedback
  • In the real world, DMC has been found to be negatively associated with decisions to engage in risk behaviors (delinquency, alcohol use etc.).

Thus, it seems that decision-making competence captures the abilities that matter in everyday life.

Decision-making is a competence that differentiates people (inspiration and effectiveness to insanity and stupidity). Large part of the performance differences in decisions appear to be strongly influenced by the cognitive limits. The rest of the differences are due to emotions, stress, lack of information, lack of method or a mix of all that.

You will be able to surpass part of them by going through our career development process.

 

Tiedeman's career decision model - adaptability will make you win


 

More than 40 years ago, Tiedeman (1961) then Tiedeman and O'Hara (1963) formulated a model that strongly emphasized adaptation, as an essential natural component of the career development process.

 

The central assumption of the model, very audacious, is that security is very dangerous for growth. Challenges are essential for human career and growth and good for his happiness because without such challenges we would not have the opportunity of knowing ourselves and observe our behavior in various contexts.

 

Tiedeman describes a process of career development in which people continually redefine their career interests and commitments through different decision-making phases. Individuals who are more flexible and better at navigating the job market opportunities are more likely to obtain success.

 

One of Tiedeman's major contributions is his decisional model. There are four main ideas of Tiedeman's career decision model to bear in mind:

 

No.1:  The career decision-making process has phases that can be recycled and revisited.

In the modern and fast-paced job market, career decision changes are part of a normal career development process, and they should not be interpreted as setbacks or failures to make a commitment to a goal. A career decision change can occur either because of the domain (i.e. in advanced technology, permanently new discoveries and innovations often involve professional readjustment) or because of the normal maturation of a person who discover that initial career goal no longer holds the same interest or motivation in the present.

 

No.2: Development in reverse is possible and normal. Working "backward" through decision-making process for reviewing conjunctures and steps can be a healthy process. As somebody reconsiders a certain career path this means going back through decisional process and questioning each decision element; in the end that person arrives at a new choice or a new exploration in order to discover unconsidered opportunities.  

 

No.3: Career can be nonlinear. In a concrete example, a young man graduate and receive an offer to manage his uncle's business; he passes rapidly over initial phases and engage directly in decision implementation. If after a while he realizes that he wants a career in a domain other than his uncle's business, he will pass in the exploration phase in order to find new opportunities but using the experiences accumulated until that moment.

 

No. 4: Career development can occur in parallel streams. This is the case of a person following simultaneously several vocational interests; he/she can be exploring the job market for finding a new profession while continuing to develop expertise in a current occupation.